Gas Tax and Public Transit Funds Joint Evaluations number of persons interviewed, number of respondents to surveys, number of case studies
| Province/Territory Association/City |
Provincial/ Territorial |
Municipal and Other Associations | Municipal | Respondents to Surveys | Case Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberta | 5 | 3 | NA | 29 | NA |
| British Columbia - UBCM | 8 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 12 |
| Manitoba | 4 | 3 | 13 | 168 | 10 |
| New Brunswick | 2 | 1 | 16 | 25 | 5 |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 6 | 4 | 9 | 102 | 5 |
| Northwest Territories | 3 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Nova Scotia | 5 | 1 | 18 | 16 | 7 |
| Nunavut | 9 | 1 | 9 | NA | 6 |
| Ontario-AMO | 2 | 24 | 150 | 391 | |
| Ontario - City of Toronto | 1 | NA | 17 | NA | 4 |
| Prince Edward Island | 4 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 5 |
| Québec2 | 3 | NA | |||
| Saskatchewan | 4 | 8 | 19 | 108 | 5 |
| Yukon | 4 | 26 | NA | 5 | |
| Total | 60 | 202 | 693 | 108 | |
| Federal Government Representatives | 14 | ||||
Under the Gas Tax Program, Canada, the provinces and territories and other signatories (AMO, UBCM, City of Toronto), and the recipients are subject to a set of reporting requirements under the terms of the Agreements.
Canada must carry out:
The Signatories, i.e. the provinces and territories, AMO, UBCM and the City of Toronto must submit:
Recipients of the funds are also subject to reporting requirements which are very similar to those of the signatories.
Canada and the Signatories must carry out a joint formative evaluation, no later than March 31, 2009. The evaluation will address the issues related to achievement of the objectives of this Agreement, the use of funding, the effectiveness of the funding approach, and the effectiveness of the Communications Protocol.
Under the Terms and Conditions for the Program, provinces and territories compile data to assist in tracking performance and the achievements for GTF are reported in the INFC Departmental Performance Report. The framework documented in the federal/provincial/territorial agreements preserves the accountability of the Minister to Parliament for the spending of the funding.